
General info to share
During week eight, we will engage in a peer review of your logic models and consider the validity and instruments used to collect data for your program evaluation. We can also consider threats to validity to develop a more robust, more valid evaluation and to identify high-quality sources of information. We will have time in class to work on your projects. The agenda for the in-person class session includes:
Read
A-01: Class Engagement and Attendance
Attend class
A-02: Chapter Reading Quizzes
Complete W-08 A-02 Chapter Reading Quiz for Royse (2022) Chapter 08 Due by Monday 03/09 at 5:30 PM.
A-04a Individual Weekly Journal Entries
You can find the assignment W-08 A-04a Journal Entry 04 Due by Monday 3/16, 8:00 AM.
Assignment 04c: Agency Logic Model
Meta: Points 100 pts (10% of student’s final grade); Deadline An initial draft must be submitted before class on Monday, 3/9. A final draft will be completed by Monday, 03/16/26 at 8 AM; Completion initial draft via a forum post on MyHeritage and final draft via an uploaded document on MyHeritage Assignments; Locations W-08 A-04c: Agency Logic Model Peer Review Submission, A-04c: Agency Logic Model Draft Submission Assignment Detail, A-04c: Agency Logic Model Final Submission Assignment Detail, and Assignment Description and Rubric Handout.
Purpose: Developing a logic model is an essential part of program evaluation. Groups will include the logic model in the executive summary and presentation. They will submit it as a forum post and, during class, engage in peer review. This process will help groups formulate a superior final product.
Task: Group members will interview staff at their evaluation agency. The logic model examines how a program is implemented by understanding its resources, staff activities, program processes, and outcomes (often framed as immediate, intermediate, and long-range). Royse (2022) provides some context for this in chapter six.
Success: The final draft of the logic model will be submitted by group members to the MyHeritage assignments. See Appendix B for the rubric. Grades are assigned based on the content of the logic model. Feedback for this assignment will be completed by mid-term grades submission, due by the faculty on Wednesday, 03/25/26 at 5:00 PM.
Appendices B. Agency Logic Model Rubric
The Agency Logic Model Rubric evaluates student-using a student-developed rubric developed during 2024. It focuses on visual clarity, resources, staff activities, program processes, and outcomes. Visual/clarity assesses the identification of components. Resources evaluate the identification of agency resources. Staff activities review descriptions of agency services. Program processes assess descriptions of intended agency services. Short-term outcomes evaluate the definition of expected changes, including the target audience, timeframe, and desired level of change. Immediate-term outcomes review data collection and connection to program goals. Long-term outcomes assess the identification of data, outcomes, and implementations.
| Description | Initial | Emerging | Developed | Highly Developed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual/Clarity | Unable to identify the components | Able to identify 3 of the components | Able to identify 4 of the components | Able to identify all of the components. The chart is easy to read and visually appealing |
| Resources | No identification of resources | Limited or unclear identification of resources | The majority of resources were identified | Complete understanding of resources identified |
| Staff Activities | Minimal to no description of staff services provided by the agency | Seldom description of the staff services provided by the agency | Partial description of most of the staff services provided by the agency | A clear description of all staff services provided by the agency |
| Program Processes | Minimal to no description of the intended service(s) of the agency | Seldom a description of half of the intended service(s) of the agency | Partial description of most of the intended service(s) of the agency | Clear description of the intended service(s) of the agency |
| Short-Term Outcomes | Limited or no data collected. Brief and unclear statements | Some data was collected, but it is very brief with little detail | Defines the expected change in the program | Specifies the target audience, timeframe, and desired level of change |
| Immediate Term Outcomes | Did not develop data collection or incomplete | It shows some connection to activities but needs clarification | Explains how the changes were implemented to the program’s goals | Identifies relevant data collection methods to track the progress of program evaluation |
| Long-Term Outcomes | Vague or no data and outcomes identified | The outcome has been identified, but it is brief and unclear. The data is somewhat relevant to the outcome | Describes new implementations and long-term outcome goals; minor additions are needed to develop the logic model’s long-term outcomes | Implementations and Long-term outcomes are identified and specified in depth under each category based on program-needed change(s) at the agency |
We are going to be peer-reviewing your logic models, you can find A-04c: Agency Logic Model Draft Submission Assignment Detail.
During class we will talk about some of the following:
All of the presentations for this class can be found at https://presentations.jacobrcampbell.com. This week’s slides are Spring 2026 SOWK 460w Week 08 - Instruments and Validity.
The Lecture Videos tab in the MyHeritage course is where you will be able to find class recordings. The video this week is at [Spring 2026 SOWK 460w Week 08]().